Choose any essay below. Each section includes the full question, complete sample essay, writing suggestions, and reusable sentence-formation patterns in one place.
In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Today, in many countries, individuals can purchase food produced around the world at a supermarket. I believe that this should be seen as a positive trend because it can enhance cultural exchange and be convenient for people.
Purchasing imported food at a supermarket is vital for cultural exchange. When individuals experience different flavors from the world, they may understand a country's culture more. To illustrate, there are various types of curry. Consider Japan and Thailand. The former's curry flavor is sweet while the latter's is green and spicy. People can experience the bold, spicy flavors of Thai cuisine and the milder, more subtle tastes of Japanese cuisine simply by buying curry in their local grocery stores. Not everyone can afford to travel and experience different cultures, so buying imported food in their local supermarket might be another way to get to know other cultures.
In addition, purchasing food from around the world at a supermarket could be very convenient for people. They do not have to waste their time planning a trip to eat in an overseas restaurant. Instead, they can buy everything they need to make foreign dishes from one supermarket. For example, in the past, people had to book a flight and a hotel room and travel all the way to Japan to have authentic sushi. However, now they can buy sushi rice and nori imported from Japan, and make it themselves.
In conclusion, buying food produced around the world is not only good for understanding other cultures, but it also saves people time, and therefore this should be seen as a positive development.
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In many countries, the population of the countryside is dwindling as rural residents leave for cities. I believe this should be seen as a negative trend because it not only hurts rural businesses but also creates challenges for maintaining essential services for rural communities.
A shrinking population in the countryside can have detrimental effects on local businesses. With fewer residents, there is reduced demand for goods and services, leading to a downturn in local businesses and therefore bringing inconvenience to the daily lives of the local community. For example, in the United States, low sales volumes caused by the decline in population in some rural areas made it financially unsustainable for Walmart to continue operating stores there. The closures of the Walmart stores meant that local residents lost a convenient and affordable shopping option that provided a range of products under one roof. Consequently, they had to travel long distances to access similar goods, which created hardships for those without reliable transportation.
Furthermore, a declining rural population poses challenges in sustaining essential local services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure in the area. Consider rural schools. As the population dwindles, they may struggle to maintain sufficient enrollment. This, in turn, can create financial challenges for the schools and make it difficult for them to retain qualified teachers and offer a diverse range of educational programs. As a consequence, the educational disparity between students in rural areas and their counterparts in cities may be further exacerbated.
In conclusion, the decreasing rural population is a negative development that poses challenges for rural businesses and the provision of essential local services. Efforts should be made to address this issue and find ways to revitalize rural communities, ensuring their sustainable growth and well-being.
Organized tours to remote places and communities are increasingly popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment?
The popularity of organized tours to remote areas and communities has been on the rise in recent years. In my view, this trend is beneficial for both local people and the environment, as it provides livelihood opportunities, curbs deforestation, and raises awareness about the importance of conserving fragile ecosystems.
One of the main advantages of ecotourism is that it creates livelihood possibilities for local communities. In remote areas, the options for local people to earn a living are often limited to activities such as farming and hunting. However, the growing popularity of ecotourism has created alternative sources of income, such as working as tour guides or selling handicrafts to tourists. This additional income can improve the lives of local communities.
Furthermore, ecotourism can help to protect local environments by reducing the impact of human-made deforestation. For example, in the Amazon rainforest, as ecotourism provides indigenous people with better alternative livelihoods, they are less reliant on activities such as logging and farming that can damage the forest.
Ecotourism also has the potential to increase public awareness about the cruciality of conserving endangered habitats. By providing visitors with educational experiences and information, ecotourism can help them understand the role these areas play in scientific research and mitigating the effects of climate change. This increased understanding may lead to greater support for conservation efforts.
In conclusion, ecotourism can be seen as a positive development for local people and the environment. It offers livelihood opportunities, fights deforestation, and raises consciousness about the value of protecting delicate environments.
In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development?
In the last few years, many small neighborhood stores have experienced bankruptcy as a result of customers preferring to shop at large shopping centers. In my opinion, this should be seen as a negative development because it harms retail wages as well as the environment.
Big-box stores lower workers' wages. One reason why retail giants such as Target and Walmart frequently put mom-and-pop stores out of business is that they sell the same products at much lower prices. They are able to do this partly because they pay their workers as little as possible. For example, the average wage for Walmart workers in the US in 2022 was only $13 per hour. Many low-skilled workers have no choice but to take these jobs because the local businesses which offered higher pay have closed their doors and big-box retailers are the only major employers in the area.
Additionally, shopping at large malls directly hurts the environment. When small, local businesses lined the streets, residents could simply walk to stores to do their shopping, which is an eco-friendly way of travel. Contrarily, shoppers must now drive to large chain stores. If one looks at the extensive parking lots of these stores, one will know the number of private cars they attract. This is detrimental to the environment since private vehicles have a very high rate of carbon emissions per-capita.
In conclusion, large retail chains replacing small, local businesses is a negative trend. Not only do they provide unlivable wages to employees, these big retailers also contribute to environmental pollution.
Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctors. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
More and more people with health issues are now choosing alternative medicines and therapies over conventional treatment recommended by their practitioners. I believe this is a negative development because many alternatives are not held to the same standards as mainstream treatments and are often less useful in emergencies. Buy vitamins and supplements
Many alternatives are not strictly regulated. In most countries, alternative medicines are not classified as drugs and are, therefore, not subject to the same regulations in terms of efficacy and safety, or in the way that they are marketed. This can be seen in herbal remedies which falsely claim to have special ingredients that affect effectiveness, when there is no evidence of this. The same can be said for alternative therapies. Many of these therapies are not conducted by registered practitioners who are permitted to work by a regulatory board. As a result, there is nothing to stop unethical or, even, unsafe practice from taking place.
In addition, non-conventional medical treatments would not be as useful in emergency situations. They take time to work, whereas conventional treatments are developed to take effect fast. If people with conditions or symptoms that need to be relieved right away opt for alternative therapies, they might miss the window of opportunity to cure their diseases. Consider patients who require tumor removal as soon as possible. If they delay surgery in the hopes that a non-mainstream treatment would work, the tumor might grow and spread to other parts of their bodies.
In conclusion, the increased use of alternative medicines and therapies should be viewed as a negative development due to a lack of regulation and their ineffectiveness in emergency situations.
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the same products are available for purchase anywhere in the world, causing increasing similarities among countries. I believe this should be seen as a negative development for the entire world because it is making the world's cultures less diverse and could also be detrimental to the travel industry.
The availability of the same products all over the world is leading to cultural loss since a product is part of a culture. For instance, fifty years ago, most Indian people wore clothing like saris and dhotis. However, the expansion of global brands such as Nike and Addidas into the Indian Market has led to a rise in the wearing of western-style clothing among young people. As traditional Indian clothing is being replaced by western fashions, some of the longstanding values of that country are being lost.
In addition, countries becoming more alike could affect the tourism industry. Many people pay a visit to another place to experience something unique to that culture. For example, a survey shows that Thai cuisine is the feature of Thailand that is most attractive to international tourists. However, now authentic Thai restaurants can be found all over the world, which means people no longer need to fly to Thailand to have a taste of real Thai food. This could result in a decrease in the number of foreign visitors to that country.
In conclusion, I believe it is a negative trend that countries are becoming less different. For one thing, it is threatening cultural diversity and, for another, it harms the tourism sector.
More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch ( TV programmes to get their news. They get their news from the Internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
An increasing number of people do not get news from traditional media anymore. Instead, they turn to the Internet for it. I believe this is a positive development because consuming news online offers more fun and also helps it circulate fast.
It is much more fun to get news online than from traditional media. On the Internet, a person can discuss their favorite current affairs with like-minded people. Take Tesla enthusiasts for example. If they read news about the latest model on Twitter, they can share their excitement and discuss in the comments whether the model is worth buying. This is much more fun than watching the news on TV with their aunts who know nothing about electric cars.
In addition, news travels faster on the Internet than on traditional media. This is because once a person reposts a news story on social media, all their friends and colleagues will see it as well. And, the more public attention it gets, the more likely the related problem is to be solved. For example, a video showing a white woman blocking a black man from entering his own apartment building went viral on Facebook. This pressured her employer to take a stand against her discriminatory behavior, with the result that she lost her job.
In conclusion, the Internet not only offers a more fun way to consume news but also allows it to spread fast. Thus, it is a positive development that the Internet is becoming more and more popular as a news source.