Choose any one of the three essays below. The selected essay will open with the full question, complete sample essay, and writing suggestions together in one place.
In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
The practice of encouraging young people to work or travel for a year between high school graduation and starting university is common in some countries. Students who decide to pursue this can benefit from an understanding of their desired career and avoid burnout through taking the break. However, these same students may lose the motivation to enter college and struggle to relearn how to study.
On a positive note, students who take time before entering into a university are able to explore who they are and what they enjoy doing, causing them to be excited to study for a career they know that they want when they do return to school. Students can also avoid burnout by taking time away from studying. As a result, students can return to school with clear goals and the energy to achieve them.
Yet this might not be the case. Many countries expect students to enter straight into university after high school because these students have grown accustomed to studying and sitting in the classroom. For students who choose to work or travel in-between high school and college, they may lose skills such as taking notes and fishing schoolwork on time and struggle to relearn how to study in college. Similarly, students who travel or work before college may be hesitant to give up the paid jobs they are working for the sake of taking on college debt.
In conclusion, taking a year to travel or work could benefit students by helping them learn what they want to study in college and prevent exhaustion. However, these same students may lose the skills they have learned in school and choose to pursue a salary instead of more schooling.
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic. What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
In modern times, adventure tourism is becoming increasingly popular. I believe that participating in related activities can be a great way to unwind and learn about global ecosystems. However, visitors may be at risk for becoming seriously ill when facing harsh environments or wildlife attacks.
On the one hand, venturing into the wild is an excellent way to relax. It allows people to experience the most striking features that nature has to offer, from the 360° horizons of the Sahara desert to the ginormous icebergs across Antarctica. Immersed in beautiful environments as such, visitors are granted a chance to forget about the problems they face at home and work. Additionally, ecotourism can also be educational. For example, when traveling in the Antarctic, tourists can learn about native wildlife and how climate change has been impacting this white continent. This can help them become more environmentally aware.
However, there are certain risks to exploring the wilderness. Firstly, visitors may become extremely ill in tough environments. For example, they may be unable to withstand the extreme heat of a desert and develop symptoms of dehydration. Similarly, adventure travel exposes tourists to unpredictable attacks by wild animals like seals in Antarctic regions. Because many visitors have no previous experience handling wild animals, they may be seriously injured and even lose their lives. Best vacation packages due to a dangerous encounter.
In conclusion, visiting remote, wild areas of the world can help people reduce stress and become more environmentally conscious, but only if the risks such as harsh environments and wildlife attacks are handled safely.
In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?
In some cultures, children are often given the message that as long as they work hard enough, they can accomplish anything. I believe sending them this message may increase their chances of success in life and also help them grow as a person. The main downsides may be that it can deprive them of a happy childhood and even make them doubt themselves.
On the positive side, the message in question may help increase children's odds of success in life. It can make them believe in their talents and abilities. Such self-assurance can motivate them to work hard to move toward their goal. They may also experience personal growth in the process. When they commit to a goal, they learn to become, for example, more accountable and resourceful in order to make it a reality. Abilities like these can be valuable in their personal as well as their future professional lives.
On the negative side, telling children they can realize any of their dreams through hard work may prevent them from enjoying their childhood. They may devote all their free time to pursuing their goal, leaving little time to have fun with their peers. The message may also lead to self-doubt. Children are too young to be mentally strong enough to face big failures in life. The fact that they fail despite all the hard work may lead them to doubt their ability and intelligence.
In conclusion, telling children anything is achievable if they put in enough effort may raise their odds of success in life and also help in their personal growth. However, it may also come with the disadvantages of causing self-doubt and keeping them from having a happy childhood.